The date of building 338 at Megiddo: a rejoinder
Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Soc.
2017
|
| Dans: |
Israel exploration journal
Année: 2017, Volume: 67, Numéro: 1, Pages: 50-60 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Megiddo
/ Palestine
/ Archéologie
/ Préhistoire et protohistoire
/ Israël
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | BC Religions du Proche-Orient ancien HH Archéologie |
| Résumé: | Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating to Stratum VA–IVB, on the basis of all available data. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0021-2059 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Israel exploration journal
|