The date of building 338 at Megiddo: a rejoinder
Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Print Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Soc.
2017
|
| В: |
Israel exploration journal
Год: 2017, Том: 67, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 50-60 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Megiddo
/ Палестина (мотив)
/ Археология (мотив)
/ Доисторический и раннеисторический период (дисциплина)
/ Израиль (мотив)
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | BC Религии Древнего Востока HH Археология |
| Итог: | Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating to Stratum VA–IVB, on the basis of all available data. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0021-2059 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Israel exploration journal
|