The date of building 338 at Megiddo: a rejoinder

Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Usishḳin, Daṿid 1935- (Author)
格式: Print 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Soc. 2017
In: Israel exploration journal
Year: 2017, 卷: 67, 发布: 1, Pages: 50-60
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Megiddo / 巴勒斯坦 / 考古学 / 史前及原史时代 / 以色列
IxTheo Classification:BC Ancient Orient; religion
HH Archaeology
实物特征
总结:Recently Kleiman, Kaplan and Finkelstein (2016) presented the results of their excavation in the area of Building 338 in Megiddo, arguing that the data acquired in the new excavation proves that Building 338 should be dated to Stratum IVA. In the present rejoinder I continue to argue for its dating to Stratum VA–IVB, on the basis of all available data.
ISSN:0021-2059
Contains:Enthalten in: Israel exploration journal