Legislating the Lips: Revisiting Vows and Oaths in the Temple Scroll and the Damascus Document
The Temple Scroll (11QTa 53:11-54:5) and Damascus Document (CD 16:6-12) each appropriate legislation concerning vows and oaths from Deut 23:22-24 and Num 30:3-17. Lawrence H. Schiffman, who has offered the only at-length comparison of these appropriations, characterizes these halakhot as incongruent...
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | 電子 Article |
語言: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
出版: |
Brill
[2019]
|
In: |
Dead Sea discoveries
Year: 2019, 卷: 26, 發布: 1, Pages: 76-99 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Tempelrolle (Qumrantexte) 53
/ Tempelrolle (Qumrantexte) 54
/ Damaskusschrift (Qumrantexte) 16
/ Bibel. Deuteronomium 23,22-24
/ Bibel. Numeri 30,3-17
/ 誓言
/ 宣誓
|
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament HD Early Judaism |
Further subjects: | B
Numbers
B Deuteronomy B Oaths B Damascus Document B Temple Scroll B annulments B Vows |
在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
總結: | The Temple Scroll (11QTa 53:11-54:5) and Damascus Document (CD 16:6-12) each appropriate legislation concerning vows and oaths from Deut 23:22-24 and Num 30:3-17. Lawrence H. Schiffman, who has offered the only at-length comparison of these appropriations, characterizes these halakhot as incongruent and links this conclusion with his position that the Temple Scroll is Sadducean and the Damascus Document comes from a later Sadducean splinter group. However, my analysis leads to a different conclusion. I demonstrate that the authors of the Temple Scroll and Damascus Document evidence distinct aims in their appropriations of shared base texts, but not necessarily incongruence nor intentional divergence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5179 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Dead Sea discoveries
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685179-12341466 |