Christian Environmental Ethics and Economic Stasis

The growth paradigm assumes that economic growth is objectively good because it leads to increased prosperity and utility maximization. Christian ethics oppose this worldview because it rejects the idea that economic prosperity is objectively good. Instead, Christian ethics are theocentric, assuming...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Snyder, Brian F. (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Brill [2019]
In: Worldviews
Year: 2019, 卷: 23, 發布: 2, Pages: 154-170
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B 基督教 / / / 環境倫理 / Steadystate (經濟)
IxTheo Classification:CB Christian life; spirituality
NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics
Further subjects:B steady-state economics
B Christianity
B Degrowth
B Dualism
在線閱讀: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
實物特徵
總結:The growth paradigm assumes that economic growth is objectively good because it leads to increased prosperity and utility maximization. Christian ethics oppose this worldview because it rejects the idea that economic prosperity is objectively good. Instead, Christian ethics are theocentric, assuming that God and the relationship with the divine is objectively good. Material prosperity is seen to interfere with this relationship. Still, there are at least two views of the human-divine relationship that have implications for environmental ethics. The first and most popular view argues that the human-divine relationship is mediated by the human-in-community relationship. Alternatively, individualistic theism posits that the human-divine relationship is individually available without community-centeredness. This individualistic view has been criticized as leading to an insufficient ethic of environmental care, however, here we argue that a radical dualism consistent with the Christian Gospels can lead to an ethos of environmental benevolence.
ISSN:1568-5357
Contains:Enthalten in: Worldviews
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685357-02302002