The Praise of Folly and the Limits of Satiric Licence
In this essay, I reconsider the proposition that Erasmus' The Praise of Folly is a satire—an attribution of genre that has long been treated as a truism. I argue that greater attention to several key sources can adjust our understanding of both the text and its kind. The article examines the e...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Erasmus studies
Έτος: 2019, Τόμος: 39, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 217-241 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | CD Χριστιανισμός και Πολιτισμός KAG Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1500-1648, Μεταρρύθμιση, Ανθρωπισμός, Αναγέννηση |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
The Praise of Folly
B Μετάφραση (Καθολική Εκκλησία) B mordax B Reception B Genre B Σάτιρα B Juvenal B biting |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Σύνοψη: | In this essay, I reconsider the proposition that Erasmus' The Praise of Folly is a satire—an attribution of genre that has long been treated as a truism. I argue that greater attention to several key sources can adjust our understanding of both the text and its kind. The article examines the early reception of Folly's speech; a pivotal passage in the text itself; crucial translation choices; and Erasmus' reflections on both his creation and the nature of satire. I investigate the idea of the Praise as a satire not to quibble about generic designations but to bring into relief Erasmus' contribution to questions of creative licence during the Renaissance; in particular, the permissible scope of social critique, or how to approach the darker side of epideixis. |
|---|---|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Erasmus studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18749275-03902001 |