Identification with Religion: Cross-National Evidence from a Social Psychological Perspective
Why is religion a more central social identity for some people than for others? Previous studies focus on explaining individual differences in religious affiliation and religiosity, often using the term "identification" in reference to these concepts. Yet, few scholars operationalize—let a...
| Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Έτος: 2019, Τόμος: 58, Τεύχος: 4, Σελίδες: 790-812 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Γερμανία (ΛΔΓ, μοτίβο)
/ Πολωνοί
/ Großbritannien
/ Θρησκευτική ταυτότητα (μοτίβο)
/ Πείραμα
/ Κοινωνική ψυχολογία
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | AD Κοινωνιολογία της θρησκείας, Πολιτική της θρησκείας ΑΕ Ψυχολογία της θρησκείας |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Θρησκεία
B identity centrality B Religious Identity B Identification B Social Psychology |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Σύνοψη: | Why is religion a more central social identity for some people than for others? Previous studies focus on explaining individual differences in religious affiliation and religiosity, often using the term "identification" in reference to these concepts. Yet, few scholars operationalize—let alone attempt to explain—identification with religion in social psychological terms, i.e., as a construct that captures the subjective psychological centrality of one's religious identity. After underscoring the benefits of exploring religious identification using cross-national data, we employ an original data set composed of nationally representative surveys in three European countries to model religious identification in two ways: importance (independent strength of attachment) and prominence (prioritization of one's religious identity relative to the others one holds). We document substantial variation in the degree to which individuals define themselves on the basis of their religious identity. We then test predictions drawn from existing theories to model these two measures. Our results extend current understandings of what shapes psychological attachment to religion and raise new questions for future theorization and analysis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-5906 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12634 |