Reason with Baggage
In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewi...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Jahr: 2019, Band: 47, Heft: 4, Seiten: 696-715 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Novak, David 1941-
/ Judentum
/ Naturrecht
/ Christentum
|
IxTheo Notationen: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus BH Judentum CC Christentum und nichtchristliche Religionen; interreligiöse Beziehungen |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
David Novak
B Theology B Jewish-Christian dialogue B Natural Law B Metaphysics |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Zusammenfassung: | In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewish thought and practice that admit of the same three parts. As a result of this interpretation, I posit that Paul Nahme, who argues for a pragmatic reading of Novak's theory, as well as Martin Kavka and Randi Rashkover, who offer a political understanding of it, do not account for the theological richness and metaphysical basis of Novak's natural law theology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12287 |