Reason with Baggage
In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewi...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| En: |
Journal of religious ethics
Año: 2019, Volumen: 47, Número: 4, Páginas: 696-715 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Novak, David 1941-
/ Judaísmo
/ Derecho natural
/ Cristianismo
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión BH Judaísmo CC Cristianismo ; Religión no cristiana ; Relaciones inter-religiosas |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
David Novak
B Theology B Jewish-Christian dialogue B Natural Law B Metaphysics |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewish thought and practice that admit of the same three parts. As a result of this interpretation, I posit that Paul Nahme, who argues for a pragmatic reading of Novak's theory, as well as Martin Kavka and Randi Rashkover, who offer a political understanding of it, do not account for the theological richness and metaphysical basis of Novak's natural law theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12287 |