Reason with Baggage
In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewi...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Anno: 2019, Volume: 47, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 696-715 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Novak, David 1941-
/ Ebraismo
/ Diritto naturale
/ Cristianesimo
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AB Filosofia delle religioni BH Ebraismo CC Cristianesimo; religione non cristiana; relazioni interreligiose |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
David Novak
B Theology B Jewish-Christian dialogue B Natural Law B Metaphysics |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewish thought and practice that admit of the same three parts. As a result of this interpretation, I posit that Paul Nahme, who argues for a pragmatic reading of Novak's theory, as well as Martin Kavka and Randi Rashkover, who offer a political understanding of it, do not account for the theological richness and metaphysical basis of Novak's natural law theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12287 |