Reason with Baggage
In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewi...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| В: |
Journal of religious ethics
Год: 2019, Том: 47, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 696-715 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Novak, David 1941-
/ Иудаизм (мотив)
/ Естественное право (мотив)
/ Христианство (мотив)
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии BH Иудаизм CC Христианство и нехристианские религии; Межрелигиозные отношения |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
David Novak
B Theology B Jewish-Christian dialogue B Natural Law B Metaphysics |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewish thought and practice that admit of the same three parts. As a result of this interpretation, I posit that Paul Nahme, who argues for a pragmatic reading of Novak's theory, as well as Martin Kavka and Randi Rashkover, who offer a political understanding of it, do not account for the theological richness and metaphysical basis of Novak's natural law theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12287 |