Augustine and Natural Law: Negotiating the Saeculum with Markus, Milbank, and Mathewes

Contemporary Augustinian political theology has encompassed numerous interpretations of Augustine's understanding of the two cities, but a common feature of many is a denial of the presence of natural law in the bishop's thought. This paper surveys three major interpreters of Augustine - R...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Fogleman, Alex (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2019]
В: Political theology
Год: 2019, Том: 20, Выпуск: 7, Страницы: 595-612
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Augustinus, Aurelius, Святой 354-430 / Естественное право (мотив) / Markus, R. A. 1924-2010 / Milbank, John 1952- / Mathewes, Charles T. 1969-
Индексация IxTheo:CG Христианство и политика
KAB Раннее христианство
KAJ Новейшее время
VA Философия
Другие ключевые слова:B Augustine
B John Milbank
B Creation
B Natural Law
B Charles Mathewes
B use-enjoyment
B Robert A. Markus
Online-ссылка: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Описание
Итог:Contemporary Augustinian political theology has encompassed numerous interpretations of Augustine's understanding of the two cities, but a common feature of many is a denial of the presence of natural law in the bishop's thought. This paper surveys three major interpreters of Augustine - Robert Markus, John Milbank, and Charles Mathewes - and their conceptions of the secular and its relation to natural law. It argues first that, despite major divergences, they share a common distrust of natural law. Second, drawing on Vincent Lloyd's distinction of natural law as process versus product, I suggest a picture of what a uniquely Augustinian account of natural law might entail, grounded in a semiotic theory of creation, a distinction between orders of nature and wills, and a view of the use-enjoyment paradigm. An Augustinian natural law, then, is not only warranted but also may be a useful means of rapprochement between Augustinians and natural law theologians.
ISSN:1743-1719
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1631549