Augustine and Natural Law: Negotiating the Saeculum with Markus, Milbank, and Mathewes

Contemporary Augustinian political theology has encompassed numerous interpretations of Augustine's understanding of the two cities, but a common feature of many is a denial of the presence of natural law in the bishop's thought. This paper surveys three major interpreters of Augustine - R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Fogleman, Alex (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2019]
In: Political theology
Jahr: 2019, Band: 20, Heft: 7, Seiten: 595-612
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Augustinus, Aurelius, Heiliger 354-430 / Naturrecht / Markus, R. A. 1924-2010 / Milbank, John 1952- / Mathewes, Charles T. 1969-
IxTheo Notationen:CG Christentum und Politik
KAB Kirchengeschichte 30-500; Frühchristentum
KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Augustine
B John Milbank
B Creation
B Natural Law
B Charles Mathewes
B use-enjoyment
B Robert A. Markus
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Contemporary Augustinian political theology has encompassed numerous interpretations of Augustine's understanding of the two cities, but a common feature of many is a denial of the presence of natural law in the bishop's thought. This paper surveys three major interpreters of Augustine - Robert Markus, John Milbank, and Charles Mathewes - and their conceptions of the secular and its relation to natural law. It argues first that, despite major divergences, they share a common distrust of natural law. Second, drawing on Vincent Lloyd's distinction of natural law as process versus product, I suggest a picture of what a uniquely Augustinian account of natural law might entail, grounded in a semiotic theory of creation, a distinction between orders of nature and wills, and a view of the use-enjoyment paradigm. An Augustinian natural law, then, is not only warranted but also may be a useful means of rapprochement between Augustinians and natural law theologians.
ISSN:1743-1719
Enthält:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1631549