Power, ideology, and women's ordination: Discursive strategies in three Roman Catholic documents

This article analyzes through a linguistic lens three official documents of the Roman Catholic Church on women's ordination; it also identifies various discursive tactics utilized by text creators to reinforce gender hierarchy within the Church. Drawing from Fairclough's three dimensional...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Kim, Eun-Young Julia (Автор) ; Matiko, Beverly J. (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Sage [2019]
В: Critical research on religion
Год: 2019, Том: 7, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 237-256
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Inter insigniores / Johannes Paul, II., Папа римский (мотив) 1920-2005, Ordinatio sacerdotalis / Католическая церковь (мотив) / Женщина (мотив) / Рукоположение / Гендерная роль (мотив) / Власть / Иерархия
Индексация IxTheo:AD Социология религии
CH Христианство и общество
KDB Католическая церковь
Другие ключевые слова:B Women's Ordination
B Critical Discourse Analysis
B Catholic Church
B Women priests
B Inter Insigniores
B Ordinatio Sacerdotalis of John Paul II
Online-ссылка: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Описание
Итог:This article analyzes through a linguistic lens three official documents of the Roman Catholic Church on women's ordination; it also identifies various discursive tactics utilized by text creators to reinforce gender hierarchy within the Church. Drawing from Fairclough's three dimensional discourse framework, we examine the ideological message embedded in the linguistic features and the role each text plays within a matrix of power relations. Through close readings of Inter Insigniores: On the Question of Admission of Women to the Ministerial Priesthood, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis of John Paul II, and Women and the Priesthood, we demonstrate how discourse analysis can serve as a useful tool for identifying logical fallacies, inconsistencies, dilemmas, and manipulative tactics in religious discourses.
ISSN:2050-3040
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/2050303219874375