Beyond reception: understanding Theodor Haecker's Kierkegaardian authorship in the Third Reich
Theodor Haecker's translation and reception of Kierkegaard exerted a strong influence on interwar German readings of Kierkegaard. Recent scholarship has drawn renewed attention to Haecker's World War I Kierkegaardian polemics and the dampening of his enthusiasm for Kierkegaard after his co...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Taylor & Francis
[2019]
|
| В: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Год: 2019, Том: 80, Выпуск: 4/5, Страницы: 307-325 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Kierkegaard, Søren 1813-1855
/ Восприятие (мотив)
/ Haecker, Theodor 1879-1945
/ Внутренняя миграция
/ Субъективность
/ Правда (мотив)
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | CG Христианство и политика KAJ Новейшее время KDB Католическая церковь NBE Антропология VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Søren Kierkegaard
B Theodor Haecker B inner emigration B Theological Anthropology |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Итог: | Theodor Haecker's translation and reception of Kierkegaard exerted a strong influence on interwar German readings of Kierkegaard. Recent scholarship has drawn renewed attention to Haecker's World War I Kierkegaardian polemics and the dampening of his enthusiasm for Kierkegaard after his conversion to Catholicism in 1921. This article offers a twofold refinement of current accounts of Haecker's Kierkegaard reception. First, it shows that Haecker's attempt to describe a Catholic theological anthropology after 1931 was less a turn away from Kierkegaard and more a turning of Kierkegaard toward the Catholic intellectual tradition. Second, the article shows how this anthropological project collided with the ideology and censorship of the Third Reich, where Haecker became a key voice in the Catholic ‘inner emigration.' Revisionist methodologies in German studies have modelled how to retrieve the resonance of inner-emigration texts - literary, philosophical, theological, etc. - that were written against the grain of dictatorship. As inner emigrant, Haecker draws instinctively on Kierkegaard's authorship, life, and thought as a paradigm for his own regime-critical writing and existence. With the claim that Haecker's inner-emigration writings depend on his ongoing encounter with Kierkegaard, this article offers new access to Haecker's late thought for philosophers, theologians, and literary scholars alike. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2335 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2018.1451357 |