Moderate Inclusivism and the Conversational Translation Proviso: Revising Habermas' Ethics of Citizenship
Habermas' ethics of citizenship' raises a number of relevant concerns about the dangers of a secularistic exclusion of religious contributions to public deliberation, on the one hand, and the dangers of religious conflict and sectarianism in politics, on the other. Agreeing largely with t...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2019]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Anno: 2019, Volume: 11, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 87-112 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Habermas, Jürgen 1929-
/ Cittadino
/ Partecipazione politica
/ Etica sociale
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AB Filosofia delle religioni CH Cristianesimo e società VA Filosofia |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Religion in the Public Sphere
B Deliberative Democracy B Habermas B The Ethics of Citizenship |
| Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (KW) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | Habermas' ethics of citizenship' raises a number of relevant concerns about the dangers of a secularistic exclusion of religious contributions to public deliberation, on the one hand, and the dangers of religious conflict and sectarianism in politics, on the other. Agreeing largely with these concerns, the paper identities four problems with Habermas' approach, and attempts to overcome them: (a) the full exclusion of religious reasons from parliamentary debate; (b) the full inclusion of religious reasons in the informal public sphere; (c) the philosophical distinction between secular and religious reasons; and (d) the sociological distinction between Western' and non-Western' religions. The result is a revised version of the ethics of citizenship, which I call moderate inclusivism. Most notably, moderate inclusivism implies a replacement of Habermas' institutional translation proviso' with a more flexible conversational translation proviso'. |
|---|---|
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v11i4.2829 |