Moderate Inclusivism and the Conversational Translation Proviso: Revising Habermas' Ethics of Citizenship
Habermas' ethics of citizenship' raises a number of relevant concerns about the dangers of a secularistic exclusion of religious contributions to public deliberation, on the one hand, and the dangers of religious conflict and sectarianism in politics, on the other. Agreeing largely with t...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2019]
|
| В: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Год: 2019, Том: 11, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 87-112 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Habermas, Jürgen 1929-
/ Гражданин
/ Политическое участие
/ Социальная этика
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии CH Христианство и общество VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Religion in the Public Sphere
B Deliberative Democracy B Habermas B The Ethics of Citizenship |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (KW) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | Habermas' ethics of citizenship' raises a number of relevant concerns about the dangers of a secularistic exclusion of religious contributions to public deliberation, on the one hand, and the dangers of religious conflict and sectarianism in politics, on the other. Agreeing largely with these concerns, the paper identities four problems with Habermas' approach, and attempts to overcome them: (a) the full exclusion of religious reasons from parliamentary debate; (b) the full inclusion of religious reasons in the informal public sphere; (c) the philosophical distinction between secular and religious reasons; and (d) the sociological distinction between Western' and non-Western' religions. The result is a revised version of the ethics of citizenship, which I call moderate inclusivism. Most notably, moderate inclusivism implies a replacement of Habermas' institutional translation proviso' with a more flexible conversational translation proviso'. |
|---|---|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v11i4.2829 |