A Reply to Gollnick--Implicit Religion isn't Spirituality in Disguise
Presents a reply to James Gollnick's article comparing implicit religion with non-religious spirituality. Identification of implicit religion with the wrong alternative; Concern of the article with the nurse lecturers' commitment to the teaching of spirituality; Argument on any definition...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Equinox
[2004]
|
| In: |
Implicit religion
Year: 2004, 卷: 7, 發布: 3, Pages: 276-278 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Spirituality B Secularization (Theology) B Spiritual Life B 宗教 B Implicit Religion B Secularism |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | Presents a reply to James Gollnick's article comparing implicit religion with non-religious spirituality. Identification of implicit religion with the wrong alternative; Concern of the article with the nurse lecturers' commitment to the teaching of spirituality; Argument on any definition of spirituality as having more in common with explicit than implicit religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1697 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Is Implicit Religion Spirituality in Disguise? (2003)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Implicit religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/imre.7.3.276.66311 DOI: 10.1558/imre.v7i3.276 |