The "Reconstructed Mark" and the Reconstruction of Q: A Valid Analogy?
Described as a "thought experiment" by a number of scholars, Mark's Gospel as reconstructed exclusively from its reception by Matthew and Luke has been repeatedly advanced as a challenge to the reconstruction of Q in recent decades. This essay analyzes the "Reconstructed Mark&quo...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| Em: |
Biblical theology bulletin
Ano: 2020, Volume: 50, Número: 2, Páginas: 83-91 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Logienquelle
/ Reconstrução
/ Rekonstruktionsmethode
/ Questão sinótica
/ Metodologia
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | HC Novo Testamento |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
two-document hypothesis
B Lukan doublets B Mark-Q overlaps B reconstructed Mark B reconstruction of Q |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Recurso Electrónico
|
| Resumo: | Described as a "thought experiment" by a number of scholars, Mark's Gospel as reconstructed exclusively from its reception by Matthew and Luke has been repeatedly advanced as a challenge to the reconstruction of Q in recent decades. This essay analyzes the "Reconstructed Mark" argument, finding it to form a poorly calibrated analogy for the Q document. It will be shown that Matthew and Luke treat Q, which is a sayings collection, differently from the sayings of Jesus in Mark's Gospel, which are already valued by them more highly than Mark's narrative. Further arguments in support of the feasibility of Q's reconstruction and the attainability of its text will also be provided. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1945-7596 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Biblical theology bulletin
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0146107920913793 |