Die Gesinnung der Verantwortungsethik
Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative resp...
| Publié dans: | Evangelische Theologie |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Allemand |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
De Gruyter
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Evangelische Theologie
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Weber, Max 1864-1920, Politik als Beruf
/ Éthique de conviction
/ Éthique de la responsabilité
/ Différenciation (biologie)
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | KAJ Époque contemporaine NCA Éthique |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Informations sur les droits: | InC 1.0 |
| Résumé: | Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative respect, Weber's rationale of an ethics of responsibility is (even) circular. Employing two examples from (recent) theological ethics, the present essay sketches consequences of these conceptual weaknesses within the present debate on the refugee crisis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2198-0470 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Evangelische Theologie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14315/evth-2017-0307 DOI: 10.15496/publikation-75294 HDL: 10900/133941 |