Die Gesinnung der Verantwortungsethik
Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative resp...
| Pubblicato in: | Evangelische Theologie |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Tedesco |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
De Gruyter
[2017]
|
| In: |
Evangelische Theologie
|
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Weber, Max 1864-1920, Politik als Beruf
/ Etica della convinzione
/ Etica della responsabilità
/ Differenziazione
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | KAJ Età contemporanea NCA Etica |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| informazioni sui diritti: | InC 1.0 |
| Riepilogo: | Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative respect, Weber's rationale of an ethics of responsibility is (even) circular. Employing two examples from (recent) theological ethics, the present essay sketches consequences of these conceptual weaknesses within the present debate on the refugee crisis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2198-0470 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Evangelische Theologie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14315/evth-2017-0307 DOI: 10.15496/publikation-75294 HDL: 10900/133941 |