Die Gesinnung der Verantwortungsethik
Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative resp...
| Publicado no: | Evangelische Theologie |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Alemão |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
De Gruyter
[2017]
|
| Em: |
Evangelische Theologie
|
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Weber, Max 1864-1920, Politik als Beruf
/ Ética das intenções
/ Ética de responsabilidade
/ Diferenciação
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | KAJ Época contemporânea NCA Ética |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Rights Information: | InC 1.0 |
| Resumo: | Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative respect, Weber's rationale of an ethics of responsibility is (even) circular. Employing two examples from (recent) theological ethics, the present essay sketches consequences of these conceptual weaknesses within the present debate on the refugee crisis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2198-0470 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Evangelische Theologie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14315/evth-2017-0307 DOI: 10.15496/publikation-75294 HDL: 10900/133941 |