Die Gesinnung der Verantwortungsethik
Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative resp...
| Опубликовано в: : | Evangelische Theologie |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Немецкий |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
De Gruyter
[2017]
|
| В: |
Evangelische Theologie
|
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Weber, Max 1864-1920, Politik als Beruf
/ Этика убеждения
/ Этика ответственности
/ Дифференциация
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | KAJ Новейшее время NCA Этика |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Rights Information: | InC 1.0 |
| Итог: | Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative respect, Weber's rationale of an ethics of responsibility is (even) circular. Employing two examples from (recent) theological ethics, the present essay sketches consequences of these conceptual weaknesses within the present debate on the refugee crisis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2198-0470 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Evangelische Theologie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14315/evth-2017-0307 DOI: 10.15496/publikation-75294 HDL: 10900/133941 |