Die Gesinnung der Verantwortungsethik
Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative resp...
| 發表在: | Evangelische Theologie |
|---|---|
| 主要作者: | |
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
De Gruyter
[2017]
|
| In: |
Evangelische Theologie
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Weber, Max 1864-1920, Politik als Beruf
/ 存心倫理學
/ 青任倫理
/ 區別
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NCA Ethics |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Rights Information: | InC 1.0 |
| 總結: | Max Weber's differentiation between ethics of responsibility and ethics of conscience plays a prominent role in political ethics until today, but this is no ethical differentiation. Additionally, based on a categorical mistake, this difference is false in meta-ethical respect. In normative respect, Weber's rationale of an ethics of responsibility is (even) circular. Employing two examples from (recent) theological ethics, the present essay sketches consequences of these conceptual weaknesses within the present debate on the refugee crisis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2198-0470 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Evangelische Theologie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14315/evth-2017-0307 DOI: 10.15496/publikation-75294 HDL: 10900/133941 |