The use of the earliest greek scripture fragments in text editions
This article deals with the relation between the early papyri of the LXX and the presumed original text of the translation units. The assumed dates of these units can be compared with the assigned dates of the earliest preserved fragments. Do the oldest known fragments reflect the purest form of the...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2020
|
В: |
Textus
Год: 2020, Том: 29, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 60-79 |
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Septuaginta (Vetus Testamentum Graecum auctoritate Academiae Scientiarum Gottingensis editum)
/ Bibel. Altes Testament (Biblia Hebraica)
/ Текстовая критика
B Греческий (язык) / Фрагмент |
Индексация IxTheo: | HB Ветхий Завет |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Old Greek
B text editions B revision of the Septuagint B Septuagint B Papyri |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | This article deals with the relation between the early papyri of the LXX and the presumed original text of the translation units. The assumed dates of these units can be compared with the assigned dates of the earliest preserved fragments. Do the oldest known fragments reflect the purest form of the Old Greek or had they been revised to MT? Some modern editions of the LXX tend to disregard the possible guidance of some early fragments, recording them almost always in the apparatus rather than in the reconstructed eclectic text. Due to the recognition of revisional traits in several early fragments, a prejudice developed against them, except for P.967 covering Ezekiel and Daniel. Because of their early date these papyri should have a central place in reconstructing the original text of the LXX in text edition, certainly in the Torah. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2589-255X |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Textus
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/2589255X-bja10001 |