The use of the earliest greek scripture fragments in text editions
This article deals with the relation between the early papyri of the LXX and the presumed original text of the translation units. The assumed dates of these units can be compared with the assigned dates of the earliest preserved fragments. Do the oldest known fragments reflect the purest form of the...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2020
|
| In: |
Textus
Year: 2020, 卷: 29, 發布: 1, Pages: 60-79 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Septuaginta (Vetus Testamentum Graecum auctoritate Academiae Scientiarum Gottingensis editum)
/ Bibel. Altes Testament (Biblia Hebraica)
/ 文本批判
B 希臘語 / 殘片 |
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Old Greek
B text editions B revision of the Septuagint B Septuagint B Papyri |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | This article deals with the relation between the early papyri of the LXX and the presumed original text of the translation units. The assumed dates of these units can be compared with the assigned dates of the earliest preserved fragments. Do the oldest known fragments reflect the purest form of the Old Greek or had they been revised to MT? Some modern editions of the LXX tend to disregard the possible guidance of some early fragments, recording them almost always in the apparatus rather than in the reconstructed eclectic text. Due to the recognition of revisional traits in several early fragments, a prejudice developed against them, except for P.967 covering Ezekiel and Daniel. Because of their early date these papyri should have a central place in reconstructing the original text of the LXX in text edition, certainly in the Torah. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2589-255X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Textus
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/2589255X-bja10001 |