Deciding What Counts: The Difficulties of Comparing Stylistic Diversity. A Response to Armin D. Baum
This response to Armin Baum argues that he has asked an important question about the stylistic variation in Paul and Cicero but that his analysis lacks adequate statistical rigor. Cicero's writing certainly reveals a range of styles, depending on genre, chronology, and communicative recipients....
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Eisenbrauns
[2019]
|
Στο/Στη: |
Journal for the study of Paul and his letters
Έτος: 2019, Τόμος: 9, Τεύχος: 1/2, Σελίδες: 158-166 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
stylistic diversity
B New Testament style criticism B Pauline style B Cicero's style |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Σύνοψη: | This response to Armin Baum argues that he has asked an important question about the stylistic variation in Paul and Cicero but that his analysis lacks adequate statistical rigor. Cicero's writing certainly reveals a range of styles, depending on genre, chronology, and communicative recipients. However, it is not straightforward to compare Cicero with Paul because of the narrower range of genre and shorter timespan for Paul, and also the differing methodologies for stylistic analysis in the existing literature. Baum's analysis of the Pauline material does not adequately handle statistical significance, dependent variables, the effects of lumping, or more-recent advances in multivariate analysis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2576-7941 |
Αναφορά: | Kommentar zu "Stylistic Diversity in the Corpus Ciceronianum and in the Corpus Paulinum (2019)"
|
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of Paul and his letters
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.9.1-2.0158 |