A Gnostic History of Religions
April DeConick’s The Gnostic New Age demonstrates that scholarship of Gnosticism is still entrenched in an Eliadian phenomenological paradigm which essentializes an ahistorical sui generis “Gnosis”. This approach is traceable to the Eranos Circle, particularly Carl G. Jung and Gilles Quispel, and bu...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Review |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Anno: 2020, Volume: 32, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 75-88 |
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AA Scienze religiose AZ Nuove religioni BF Gnosi |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Phenomenology
B Gilles Quispel B Spirituality B Sui Generis B New Age B Gnosticism B Recensione |
| Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | April DeConick’s The Gnostic New Age demonstrates that scholarship of Gnosticism is still entrenched in an Eliadian phenomenological paradigm which essentializes an ahistorical sui generis “Gnosis”. This approach is traceable to the Eranos Circle, particularly Carl G. Jung and Gilles Quispel, and builds certain philosophical and psychoanalytical affinities into an ahistorical religious current. DeConick’ comparison with New Age is tenuous, and misses the important fact that Gnosticism and New Age share specific genealogical antecedents. Interdisciplinary work needs to pay more attention to the theological and colonial implications of categories, or such problematic categories will continue to take root in the gaps between academic specialisms. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341464 |