Religious Studies: Back to the Future : A Response to Markus Davidsen
The author appreciates Davidsen’s concern with the future of Religious Studies, but thinks that its strength lies in being an interdisciplinary field of study. The field has the potential to bring together scholars involved in the study of religion and demonstrate its relevance by generating insight...
| Τόπος έκδοσης: | NTT |
|---|---|
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
| Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
NTT
Έτος: 2020, Τόμος: 74, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 263-266 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | ΑΑ Θρησκειολογία FB Θεολογικές Σπουδές KBD Χώρες της Μπενελούξ |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Theology
B Religious Studies B Anthropology B Interdisciplinary |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Σύνοψη: | The author appreciates Davidsen’s concern with the future of Religious Studies, but thinks that its strength lies in being an interdisciplinary field of study. The field has the potential to bring together scholars involved in the study of religion and demonstrate its relevance by generating insights into complex, relevant and pressing problems. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
| Αναφορά: | Kritik von "Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisited (2020)"
Kritik in "Fundamental Problems and Methods in the Study of Religion (2020)" |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.3.005.VENB |