Religious Studies: Back to the Future : A Response to Markus Davidsen
The author appreciates Davidsen’s concern with the future of Religious Studies, but thinks that its strength lies in being an interdisciplinary field of study. The field has the potential to bring together scholars involved in the study of religion and demonstrate its relevance by generating insight...
Publicado no: | NTT |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
Em: |
NTT
Ano: 2020, Volume: 74, Número: 3, Páginas: 263-266 |
Classificações IxTheo: | AA Ciências da religião FB Formação teológica KBD Benelux |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Theology
B Religious Studies B Anthropology B Interdisciplinary |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (doi) |
Resumo: | The author appreciates Davidsen’s concern with the future of Religious Studies, but thinks that its strength lies in being an interdisciplinary field of study. The field has the potential to bring together scholars involved in the study of religion and demonstrate its relevance by generating insights into complex, relevant and pressing problems. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisited (2020)"
Kritik in "Fundamental Problems and Methods in the Study of Religion (2020)" |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.3.005.VENB |