Guilt and Shame, Justice and Mercy

This essay argues that the criminal justice system in the United States is flawed because it focuses principally on punishment of illegal actions without considering offenders as persons in their entirety. It considers the role that constructive shame and mercy can play in addressing this flaw. The...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Rothchild, Jonathan (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
Dans: Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2020, Volume: 48, Numéro: 3, Pages: 418-435
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B USA / Jurisprudence / Peine / Justice / Obligation juridique / Honte / Grâce
Classifications IxTheo:AB Philosophie de la religion
NCA Éthique
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Punishment
B Shame
B Guilt
B Mercy
B Criminal Justice
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This essay argues that the criminal justice system in the United States is flawed because it focuses principally on punishment of illegal actions without considering offenders as persons in their entirety. It considers the role that constructive shame and mercy can play in addressing this flaw. The essay concludes by applying this argument to the case of shaming penalties within criminal justice.
ISSN:1467-9795
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jore.12323