Ontological excess and metonymy in early-modern descriptions of Brazil: an amodern para-scientific approach to nature
This essay relies on and furthers a hypothesis advanced in previous research: that the well-known eccentricities to be found in the early-modern corpus of the Portuguese colonizers of Brazil—its references to entities like monsters and demons, its bizarre descriptions, and odd classification systems...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Fachgebiet für Religionswissenschaft im Fachbereich 11, Philipps Universität Marburg
[2020]
|
| В: |
Marburg journal of religion
Год: 2020, Том: 22, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 1-19 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Portugal
/ Колониализм (мотив)
/ Бразильянец (мотив)
/ Описание
/ Метонимия
/ Научность
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии KBR Латинская Америка VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Portuguese colonization
B para-scientific B Brazil B words and things B Analogy B ontolgy B figurative language |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | This essay relies on and furthers a hypothesis advanced in previous research: that the well-known eccentricities to be found in the early-modern corpus of the Portuguese colonizers of Brazil—its references to entities like monsters and demons, its bizarre descriptions, and odd classification systems—can be explained in view of a certain style of thinking, addressing a specific ontological concern. Ontology emerges here as a structural differentiating factor between radically distinct kinds of approach to reality, and the notions of excess and metonymy help us to characterize the specificity of a cognitive enterprise which, in its several manifestations, is literary-religious rather than scientific-empirical. Our perspective tends to challenge communicative models trying to address the difference between religious and scientific discourses merely on the level of the content and truth-values of their belief systems. Moreover it covers significantly visual culture, which helps us to present Brazilian colonial literature on a broad canvas. This paper is one of a collection that originated in the IAHR Special Conference “Religions, Science and Technology in Cultural Contexts: Dynamics of Change”, held at The Norwegian University of Science and Technology on March 1-2, 2012. For an overall introduction see the article by Ulrika Mårtensson, also published here. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-2941 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Marburg journal of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17192/mjr.2020.22.8297 |