Prenatal testing: Does reproductive autonomy succeed in dispelling eugenic concerns?

Traditionally, two main rationales for the provision of prenatal testing and screening are identified: the expansion of women’s reproductive choices and the reduction of the burden of disease on society. With the number of prenatal tests available and the increasing potential for their widespread us...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Begović, Dunja (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 8, Pages: 958-964
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B reproductive autonomy
B Screening
B prenatal
B Eugenics
B Testing
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727502663
003 DE-627
005 20230426130552.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200820s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12602  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727502663 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727502663 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Begović, Dunja  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Prenatal testing  |b Does reproductive autonomy succeed in dispelling eugenic concerns? 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Traditionally, two main rationales for the provision of prenatal testing and screening are identified: the expansion of women’s reproductive choices and the reduction of the burden of disease on society. With the number of prenatal tests available and the increasing potential for their widespread use, it is necessary to examine whether the reproductive autonomy model remains useful in upholding the autonomy of pregnant women or whether it allows public health considerations and even eugenic aims to be smuggled in under the smokescreen of autonomy. In this article I argue that if we are serious about upholding women’s autonomy in the context of prenatal testing, what is needed is a model based on a more robust conception of reproductive autonomy, such as the one defended by Josephine Johnston and Rachel Zacharias as ‘reproductive autonomy worth having’. While Johnston and Zacharias put forward a basic outline of this conception, I apply it to the specific case of prenatal testing and show how it responds to objections levelled against the reproductive autonomy model. I argue that adopting this kind of conception is necessary to avoid fundamental challenges to women’s autonomy when it comes to prenatal screening and testing. 
601 |a Autonomie 
650 4 |a Eugenics 
650 4 |a prenatal 
650 4 |a reproductive autonomy 
650 4 |a Screening 
650 4 |a Testing 
652 |a NBE:NCH 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 33(2019), 8, Seite 958-964  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:8  |g pages:958-964 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12602  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12602  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 33  |j 2019  |e 8  |h 958-964 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3741275913 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727502663 
LOK |0 005 20210929180954 
LOK |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw