Ways Out of the Patenting Prohibition? Human Parthenogenetic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

According to the judgement of the European Court of Justice in 2014, human parthenogenetic stem cells are excluded from the patenting prohibition of procedures based on hESC by the European Biopatent Directive, because human parthenotes are not human embryos. This article is based on the thesis that...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
Authors: Schickl, Hannah (Author) ; Dabrock, Peter 1964- (Author) ; Braun, Matthias 1984- (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Wiley-Blackwell [2017]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2017, 卷: 31, 發布: 5, Pages: 409-417
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B Human Dignity
B European Court of Justice
B human parthenotes
B commercial use
B totipotency
B hESC
B Human embryo
在線閱讀: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727655680
003 DE-627
005 20210902111310.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200824s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12334  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727655680 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727655680 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1154329208  |0 (DE-627)1015594131  |0 (DE-576)50069124X  |4 aut  |a Schickl, Hannah 
109 |a Schickl, Hannah 
245 1 0 |a Ways Out of the Patenting Prohibition? Human Parthenogenetic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to the judgement of the European Court of Justice in 2014, human parthenogenetic stem cells are excluded from the patenting prohibition of procedures based on hESC by the European Biopatent Directive, because human parthenotes are not human embryos. This article is based on the thesis that in light of the technological advances in the field of stem cell research, the attribution of the term ‘human embryo’ to certain entities on a descriptive level as well as the attribution of a normative protection status to certain entities based on the criterion of totipotency, are becoming increasingly unclear. The example of human parthenotes in particular demonstrates that totipotency is not at all a necessary condition for the attribution of the term ‘human embryo’. Furthermore, the example of hiPSC and somatic cells particularly shows that totipotency is also not a sufficient condition for the attribution of a normative protection status to certain entities. Therefore, it is not a suitable criterion for distinguishing between human embryos worthy of protection and human non-embryos not worthy of protection. Consequently, this conclusion has repercussions for the patenting question. The strict delineation between an ethically problematic commercial use of human embryos and the concomitant patenting prohibition of hESC-based procedures and an ethically unproblematic commercial use of human non-embryos and the therefore either unrestrictedly permitted (cf. human parthenotes) or even unregulated (cf. hiPSC) patenting of procedures based on these alleged alternatives becomes increasingly blurred. 
601 |a Prohibition 
650 4 |a European Court of Justice 
650 4 |a commercial use 
650 4 |a hESC 
650 4 |a Human Dignity 
650 4 |a Human embryo 
650 4 |a human parthenotes 
650 4 |a totipotency 
652 |a NBE:NCH 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)114170169  |0 (DE-627)501838112  |0 (DE-576)175302707  |4 aut  |a Dabrock, Peter  |d 1964- 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1076755712  |0 (DE-627)835298965  |0 (DE-576)445636289  |4 aut  |a Braun, Matthias  |d 1984- 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 31(2017), 5, Seite 409-417  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2017  |g number:5  |g pages:409-417 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.12334  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12334  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12334  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 31  |j 2017  |e 5  |h 409-417 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3742292455 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727655680 
LOK |0 005 20210902111310 
LOK |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw