Active and Passive Physician-Assisted Dying and the Terminal Disease Requirement

The view that voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide should be made available for terminal patients only is typically warranted by reference to the risks that the procedures are seen to involve. Though they would appear to involve similar risks, the commonly endorsed end-of-life...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Varelius, Jukka (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell [2016]
En: Bioethics
Año: 2016, Volumen: 30, Número: 9, Páginas: 663-671
Clasificaciones IxTheo:NBE Antropología
NCH Ética de la medicina
Otras palabras clave:B Terminal Patient
B Voluntary Active Euthanasia
B non-voluntary passive euthanasia
B physician-assisted suicide
B voluntary passive euthanasia
B Non-terminal patient
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Descripción
Sumario:The view that voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide should be made available for terminal patients only is typically warranted by reference to the risks that the procedures are seen to involve. Though they would appear to involve similar risks, the commonly endorsed end-of-life practices referred to as passive euthanasia are available also for non-terminal patients. In this article, I assess whether there is good reason to believe that the risks in question would be bigger in the case of voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide than in that of passive euthanasia. I propose that there is not. On that basis, I suggest that limiting access to voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide to terminal patients only is not consistent with accepting the existing practices of passive euthanasia.
ISSN:1467-8519
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12282