RT Article
T1 Prenatal Screening, Reproductive Choice, and Public Health
JF Bioethics
VO 29
IS 1
SP 26
OP 35
A1 Wilkinson, Stephen 1965-
LA English
PB Wiley-Blackwell
YR 2015
UL https://www.ixtheo.de/Record/1727702115
AB One widely held view of prenatal screening (PNS) is that its foremost aim is, or should be, to enable reproductive choice; this is the Pure Choice view. The article critiques this position by comparing it with an alternative: Public Health Pluralism. It is argued that there are good reasons to prefer the latter, including the following. (1) Public Health Pluralism does not, as is often supposed, render PNS more vulnerable to eugenics-objections. (2) The Pure Choice view, if followed through to its logical conclusions, may have unpalatable implications, such as extending choice well beyond health screening. (3) Any sensible version of Public Health Pluralism will be capable of taking on board the moral seriousness of abortion and will advocate, where practicable, alternative means of reducing the prevalence of disease and disability. (4) Public Health Pluralism is at least as well-equipped as the Pure Choice model to deal with autonomy and consent issues.
K1 Autonomy
K1 Consent
K1 Eugenics
K1 prenatal
K1 Public Health
K1 Reproduction
K1 Screening
DO 10.1111/bioe.12121