Making Space for the Methodological Mosaic: The Future of the Field of Science-and-Religion
This article is a response to Josh Reeves's recent book Against Methodology in Science and Religion: Recent Debates on Rationality and Theology that welcomes Reeves's proposal for an anti-essentialist future for the field of science-and-religion, particularly because it has the potential t...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
| В: |
Zygon
Год: 2020, Том: 55, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 805-811 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Reeves, Josh A. 1976-, Against methodology in science and religion
/ Религия (мотив)
/ Естественные науки (мотив)
/ Методология
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии CF Христианство и наука |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Lived Religion
B lived science and religion B Experience B Methodology B Религия (мотив) B theology and science B Scientific Method B Practice B Science B Popular Culture |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | This article is a response to Josh Reeves's recent book Against Methodology in Science and Religion: Recent Debates on Rationality and Theology that welcomes Reeves's proposal for an anti-essentialist future for the field of science-and-religion, particularly because it has the potential to move the field beyond current, well-worn methods: the dominance of Christian theology and doctrine, the importance of credibility strategies, and the dependence upon philosophical discourses. Reeves’ proposal has the potential to open the science-and-religion field to other topics, problems, and methods, such as studying lived science-and-religion. One way of doing this is to study popular culture and its artifacts such as literature, which portrays a co-mingling of religion and science at the level of day-to-day experiences and practices of characters. For at the level of lived experience, religion and science are not well-defined disciplines neatly compartmentalized into separate academic departments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12623 |