Ricœur’s Historical Intentionality and the Great Goddess Freyja
The main question in this article concerns whether hermeneutic phenomenology as a methodology can address some of the problems and critiques raised in the study of religions. Inspired by Gilhus’s proposal in her article ‘The Phenomenology of Religion and Theories of Interpretation’, I investigate th...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
[publisher not identified]
[2020]
|
| В: |
Temenos
Год: 2020, Том: 56, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 75-94 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Ricœur, Paul 1913-2005
/ Феноменология
/ Hermeneutische Logik
/ Метод
/ Северные германцы
/ Мифология
/ Freyja
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AA Религиоведение AB Философия религии BD Древнеевропейские религии |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Context
B Интерпретация B Ricœur B Historicity B Hermeneutic phenomenology B Understanding |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | The main question in this article concerns whether hermeneutic phenomenology as a methodology can address some of the problems and critiques raised in the study of religions. Inspired by Gilhus’s proposal in her article ‘The Phenomenology of Religion and Theories of Interpretation’, I investigate the possibilities in this strand of thought concerning interpretation and explanation from the perspective of Ricœur’s hermeneutic phenomenology and language theory, taking Norse mythology and the goddess Freyja as examples of how this method might work. I argue that Ricœur’s contribution to hermeneutic phenomenology is important to methodology in the study of religions, and that the historicity of the interpretation of religious phenomena is based on a lifeworldly intentionality. I also analyse the depth of understanding, the formation of ideas, and meaning in its historical context at the level of the historian’s process of interpretation, and I argue that the method may constitute a theoretical basis for an objective science. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2342-7256 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Temenos
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.33356/temenos.80350 |