The ghost of Maurice at the court of Heraclius
This paper explores the complex reception of the reign of Maurice (582-602) at the court of Heraclius (610 -641). It explores how the reign of Maurice established two important precedents for Heraclius as he emerged from the Last Great War: first, the re-establishment, after a long hiatus, of the pr...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
De Gruyter
[2019]
|
В: |
Byzantinische Zeitschrift
Год: 2019, Том: 112, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 781-826 |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
История (мотив)
B Theologie und Religion B Византинистика B Altertumswissenschaften B Diverses B Historische Epochen B Патристика |
Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Итог: | This paper explores the complex reception of the reign of Maurice (582-602) at the court of Heraclius (610 -641). It explores how the reign of Maurice established two important precedents for Heraclius as he emerged from the Last Great War: first, the re-establishment, after a long hiatus, of the principle of filial succession; and second, the realisation of a profound, co-operative peace with the Persians. It then argues, however, that Heraclian authors - in particular Theophylact Simocatta - resisted the sanctification of the murdered emperor, framing him instead as, ultimately, a failure, suggesting that he had deserved and accepted his death, and insisting that he had surrendered all of his children, including his son and co-emperor Theodosius, to the same fate. Thus the reign of Maurice was presented not as an apex from which his successors had fallen, but as a pale foreshadowing of the early triumphs of Heraclius.null |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1868-9027 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Byzantinische Zeitschrift
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/bz-2019-0032 |