From Comparative to Interreligious Theology: Perry Schmidt-Leukel's “Fractal” Version of Pluralism
Perry Schmidt-Leukel has proposed a “fractal” theory to correlate factors which are replicated across religious traditions. His aim is to develop notions of religious and theological pluralism which have become locked into a somewhat sterile conflict with “inclusivism.” A wide range of thinkers from...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal of religious history
Anno: 2020, Volume: 44, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 376-379 |
(sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Schmidt-Leukel, Perry 1954-
/ Pluralismo religioso
/ Dialogo interreligioso
/ Teologia interculturale
/ Scienze religiose comparate
|
Notazioni IxTheo: | AA Scienze religiose CC Cristianesimo; religione non cristiana; relazioni interreligiose FD Teologia contestuale |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Riepilogo: | Perry Schmidt-Leukel has proposed a “fractal” theory to correlate factors which are replicated across religious traditions. His aim is to develop notions of religious and theological pluralism which have become locked into a somewhat sterile conflict with “inclusivism.” A wide range of thinkers from a variety of religious traditions respond to his initiative, some applauding it, others criticising it as being too abstract to do justice to the particularity of religious phenomena. A highlight is Francis X. Clooney's defence of his comparative theology project as an alternative to pluralism. In reply, Schmidt-Leukel generously accepts a number of criticisms while reasserting his proposal that on the basis of fractal theory a truly interreligious theology is possible. It remains to be seen how widely fractal theory applies to concrete religious phenomena. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9809 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious history
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/1467-9809.12683 |