In defense of a regulated market economy

The dominant understanding of political corporate social responsibility (CSR) suggests new, broader political roles for businesses in the globalized economy, challenging the classical liberal social order (where business firms’ task is to focus on economic issues and the government's role is to...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Mäkinen, Jukka (Author) ; Kasanen, Eero 1952- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group [2015]
Em: Journal of global ethics
Ano: 2015, Volume: 11, Número: 1, Páginas: 99-109
Outras palavras-chave:B Political corporate social responsibility
B classical liberalism
B Globalization
B division of moral labor
B Responsabilidade social da empresa
B regulated market economy
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Descrição
Resumo:The dominant understanding of political corporate social responsibility (CSR) suggests new, broader political roles for businesses in the globalized economy, challenging the classical liberal social order (where business firms’ task is to focus on economic issues and the government's role is to take care of political responsibilities). In this paper, we show how the major framing of the political CSR discussion not only challenges the classical liberal social order but also goes against the more general political economic perspective of the regulated market economy (where strict and [in most cases] strong boundaries exist between business and politics). We argue that this latter tendency of the political CSR discussion is its main weakness. We introduce a Rawlsian reframing of political CSR that is in line with the idea of a global-regulated market economy and compatible with some of the basic global ethical aims of the political CSR movement.
ISSN:1744-9634
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Journal of global ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2015.1004464