Accountability in development: from aid effectiveness to development ethics
Adoption of the Millennium Development Goals triggered much discussion among donor states, multilateral institutions, and developing countries towards changing dysfunctional patterns of interaction that seemed to put the MDGs at risk from their inception. Initially in these high-level discussions, a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2019]
|
| In: |
Journal of global ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 15, Issue: 2, Pages: 138-154 |
| Further subjects: | B
development effectiveness
B Accountability B Development Ethics |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1739142969 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201119121825.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201119s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/17449626.2019.1636116 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1739142969 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1739142969 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1166369838 |0 (DE-627)103040044X |0 (DE-576)510748724 |4 aut |a Drydyk, Jay | |
| 109 | |a Drydyk, Jay | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Accountability in development |b from aid effectiveness to development ethics |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Adoption of the Millennium Development Goals triggered much discussion among donor states, multilateral institutions, and developing countries towards changing dysfunctional patterns of interaction that seemed to put the MDGs at risk from their inception. Initially in these high-level discussions, accountability was understood in a state-centric way, primarily as accountability to donors. This needed to be modified with the shift towards developing-country ownership of development strategies and programs. Yet an even greater change was in store when civil society organizations were included in the discussions, since their focus was on accountability to project-affected persons and communities. Hence a new and irreducible conception of accountability came on stage. I characterize this as accountability to the subjects of development and show how it is required and justified by development ethics, based on values of agency and justifiability. This results in a dual standard for accountability: reducing stakeholders’ vulnerability to harmful and inequitable outcomes, and ensuring the justifiability of development projects to affected persons and communities. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Accountability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a development effectiveness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Development Ethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of global ethics |d London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 |g 15(2019), 2, Seite 138-154 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)506719197 |w (DE-600)2219472-1 |w (DE-576)378913263 |x 1744-9634 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g pages:138-154 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1636116 |x Resolving-System |
| 936 | u | w | |d 15 |j 2019 |e 2 |h 138-154 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3806957940 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1739142969 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201119121312 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||