Objects or Others? Epistemic Agency and the Primary Harm of Testimonial Injustice
This paper re-examines the debate between those who, with Miranda Fricker, diagnose the primary, non-contingent harm of testimonial injustice as a kind of epistemic objectification and those who contend it is better thought of as a kind of epistemic othering. Defenders of the othering account of the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2020]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2020, Volume: 23, Issue: 5, Pages: 831-845 |
| Further subjects: | B
Gaslighting
B Epistemic agency B Testimonial injustice B Objectification B Othering |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1741007402 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201125101933.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201125s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-020-10078-z |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1741007402 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1741007402 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1089861893 |0 (DE-627)851158935 |0 (DE-576)46047796X |4 aut |a McGlynn, Aidan |d 1983- | |
| 109 | |a McGlynn, Aidan 1983- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Objects or Others? Epistemic Agency and the Primary Harm of Testimonial Injustice |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper re-examines the debate between those who, with Miranda Fricker, diagnose the primary, non-contingent harm of testimonial injustice as a kind of epistemic objectification and those who contend it is better thought of as a kind of epistemic othering. Defenders of the othering account of the primary harm have often argued for it by presenting cases of testimonial injustice in which the testifier’s epistemic agency is affirmed rather than denied, even while their credibility is unjustly impugned. In previous work, I have instead argued that such cases suggest that we need to enrich our conception of epistemic objectification in ways encouraged by Martha Nussbaum’s cluster analysis of objectification. Here I continue to make the case for this approach, and I consider the othering account in more detail. I focus in particular on Gaile Pohlhaus Jr.’s arguments for a version of the othering account in terms of the notion of derivatization, which turns on the idea that only such an account can enable us to properly understand the harms of testimonial injustice, in particular the ways in which it interferes with a subject’s epistemic agency and autonomy, and I’ll argue that such arguments should not sway us. Finally, I’ll further support my contention that it is illuminating and helpful to think of the primary harm of testimonial injustice in terms of epistemic objectification, though I will concede that the notion of epistemic othering may offer further helpful resources for understanding how subjects can be harmed by testimonial injustice. | ||
| 601 | |a Episteme | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemic agency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gaslighting | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Objectification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Othering | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Testimonial injustice | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 23(2020), 5, Seite 831-845 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2020 |g number:5 |g pages:831-845 |
| 856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-020-10078-z.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10078-z |x Resolving-System |
| 936 | u | w | |d 23 |j 2020 |e 5 |h 831-845 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 381216616X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1741007402 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201125101040 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a VerAnderung,Fremd-Machung |