Religious belief and cooperation: a view from Viking-Age Scandinavia

This study focuses on two hypotheses at the heart of a debate concerning cooperation, socio-political complexity, and religious belief. One of these contends that moralizing high gods (MHGs) were central to the development of complex societies. The key mechanism here is supernatural monitoring, whic...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Raffield, Ben (Συγγραφέας) ; Collard, Mark (Συγγραφέας) ; Price, Neil (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Έκδοση: Routledge [2019]
Στο/Στη: Religion, brain & behavior
Έτος: 2019, Τόμος: 9, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 2-22
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών:B Skandinavien / Βόρεια Γερμανικά φύλα / Θρησκεία (μοτίβο) / Υπέρτατο Ον / Ηθική απόφαση
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo:AB Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας, Κριτική της θρησκείας, Αθεϊσμός
AD Κοινωνιολογία της θρησκείας, Πολιτική της θρησκείας
ΑΕ Ψυχολογία της θρησκείας
KBE Βόρεια Ευρώπη, Σκανδιναβία
NBC Δόγμα του Θεού
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B Vikings
B socio-political complexity
B Norse Religion
B Cooperation
B Prosociality
B moralizing high gods
B Scandinavia
B supernatural monitoring and punishment
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:This study focuses on two hypotheses at the heart of a debate concerning cooperation, socio-political complexity, and religious belief. One of these contends that moralizing high gods (MHGs) were central to the development of complex societies. The key mechanism here is supernatural monitoring, which is the perception that gods observe humans and punish those who commit transgressions. The other hypothesis - the broad supernatural punishment (BSP) hypothesis - contends that it was fear of supernatural monitoring and punishment by non-MHG deities that fostered the development of socio-political complexity, and that MHGs followed rather than preceded the appearance of complex societies. To test between these hypotheses, we examined evidence for pre-Christian beliefs in Viking-Age Scandinavia (c. 750-1050 CE). We sought answers to two questions: (1) did the Vikings perceive themselves subject to supernatural monitoring and punishment? And (2) were the Norse gods MHGs? The evidence indicates that the Vikings believed themselves to be monitored by supernatural entities in some contexts, and that they could be punished for certain transgressions. However, the Norse gods do not meet all the criteria for recognition as MHGs. Taken together, these findings support the idea that socio-political complexity was fostered by non-MHG deities and not by MHGs.
ISSN:2153-5981
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: Religion, brain & behavior
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2017.1395764