Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Catholicism(s) in the US
Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART s) have proposed a new way of understanding notions of sexuality, reproduction, gestation, and family, and these transformations have arguably been a challenge in the religious field. This study aims to analyze the stances taken within the Catholic spectrum in t...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 载入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| In: |
Religion & gender
Year: 2019, 卷: 9, 发布: 2, Pages: 147-169 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
USA
/ 天主教
/ 授精
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CB Christian life; spirituality CF Christianity and Science KBQ North America KDB Roman Catholic Church |
| Further subjects: | B
sexual and reproductive rights
B Assisted Reproduction B Catholicism B Gender |
| 在线阅读: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| 总结: | Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART s) have proposed a new way of understanding notions of sexuality, reproduction, gestation, and family, and these transformations have arguably been a challenge in the religious field. This study aims to analyze the stances taken within the Catholic spectrum in the United States on ART s. Catholicism in the United States is an internally heterogeneous space, and different agents have taken diverse stances on ART s, with an impact on health care regulations, Catholic facilities administrations, and Catholics’ and non-Catholics’ reproductive rights. Drawing from a qualitative, interpretive, and documentary analysis of three organizations (the US Conference of catholic bishops, the Catholic Health Organization, and Catholics for Choice), this article proposes some guidelines to analyze and understand the arguments and strategies of various Catholics actors in the United States regarding reproductive healthcare and ART s in the United States. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1878-5417 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religion & gender
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18785417-00902001 |