The Paradox of Kurt Gödel: A Response
The article analyzes author Miloa Dokulil's explanation of mathematician Kurt Godel's religious inclination. It is noted that Godel's ontological argument for God's existence was not published in his lifetime and his rational platonism leaves considerable room for speculation con...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Institute for Interdisciplinary Research
[2020]
|
| In: |
Journal of interdisciplinary studies
Year: 2020, Volume: 32, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 119-136 |
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism CB Christian life; spirituality VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Religious adherents
B Platonists B Realism B Faith B Godel, Kurt, 1906-1978 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1743680767 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210720091908.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201229s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/jis2020321/27 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1743680767 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1743680767 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1146009372 |0 (DE-627)1007096780 |0 (DE-576)176727981 |4 aut |a Hollis, Daniel Webster |d 1942- | |
| 109 | |a Hollis, Daniel Webster 1942- |a Webster Hollis, Daniel 1942- |a Hollis, Daniel W. 1942- |a Webster-Hollis, Daniel 1942- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Paradox of Kurt Gödel |b A Response |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article analyzes author Miloa Dokulil's explanation of mathematician Kurt Godel's religious inclination. It is noted that Godel's ontological argument for God's existence was not published in his lifetime and his rational platonism leaves considerable room for speculation concerning his metaphysical system. It is stated that at times it is found Dokulil is examining his own belief in God as well as Godel's. | ||
| 601 | |a Gödel, Kurt | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Faith | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Godel, Kurt, 1906-1978 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Platonists | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Realism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious adherents | |
| 652 | |a AB:CB:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of interdisciplinary studies |d Santa Monica, Calif. : Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, 1989 |g 32(2020), 1/2, Seite 119-136 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341360872 |w (DE-600)2068817-9 |w (DE-576)456301429 |x 2766-0508 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2020 |g number:1/2 |g pages:119-136 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Dokulil, Miloš, 1912 - 2002 |t Kurt Gödel's Religious Worldview |d 2020 |w (DE-627)1743679556 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/jis2020321/27 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 32 |j 2020 |e 1/2 |h 119-136 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3828622690 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1743680767 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210720091908 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043768 |a CB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||