Interreligious Dialogue as a Response to Processes of Secularization: A New Perspective on the World’s Parliament of Religions
Abstract This article proposes secularization theory as a tool to better understand the rationale of IRD -activities. To make this point, it starts with a review of present-day secularisation theories. On this basis, the article presents an analysis of the concept of the secular used in the context...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Brill
2020
|
В: |
Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
Год: 2020, Том: 6, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 513-532 |
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
World's Parliament of Religions (1893 : Chicago, Ill.)
/ Секуляризм
/ Межрелигиозный диалог
|
Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии AX Межрелигиозные отношения |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Religious Studies
B Europe B secularization theory B Interreligious Dialogue |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Итог: | Abstract This article proposes secularization theory as a tool to better understand the rationale of IRD -activities. To make this point, it starts with a review of present-day secularisation theories. On this basis, the article presents an analysis of the concept of the secular used in the context of the so-called ‘1893 – World’s Parliament of Religions’. In a final step, the author argues that IRD -activities have to be understood on the basis of an implicit juxtaposition of ‘the religious’ and ‘the secular’. They try to present a ‘religious voice’ as a response to a context perceived as being secular. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2364-2807 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30965/23642807-00602014 |