Response
I am truly grateful for these observations of and insights on The Sacrality of the Secular by such an insightful and accomplished set of readers. My response is organized around three issues: the status of philosophy of religion in religious studies, the veridical-descriptive question, and the role...
| Outros títulos: | Roundtable on Bradley B. Onishi’s The Sacrality of the Secular: Postmodern Philosophy of Religion |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Oxford University Press
[2021]
|
| Em: |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Ano: 2021, Volume: 89, Número: 1, Páginas: 360-367 |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | I am truly grateful for these observations of and insights on The Sacrality of the Secular by such an insightful and accomplished set of readers. My response is organized around three issues: the status of philosophy of religion in religious studies, the veridical-descriptive question, and the role of philosophical wonder in an age of uncertainty. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4585 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: American Academy of Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfab005 |