Response
I am truly grateful for these observations of and insights on The Sacrality of the Secular by such an insightful and accomplished set of readers. My response is organized around three issues: the status of philosophy of religion in religious studies, the veridical-descriptive question, and the role...
| Subtitles: | Roundtable on Bradley B. Onishi’s The Sacrality of the Secular: Postmodern Philosophy of Religion |
|---|---|
| 主要作者: | |
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Oxford University Press
[2021]
|
| In: |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Year: 2021, 卷: 89, 發布: 1, Pages: 360-367 |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | I am truly grateful for these observations of and insights on The Sacrality of the Secular by such an insightful and accomplished set of readers. My response is organized around three issues: the status of philosophy of religion in religious studies, the veridical-descriptive question, and the role of philosophical wonder in an age of uncertainty. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4585 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: American Academy of Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfab005 |