Ventures of Women in Relation to Religion and Violence

This article is one of gratitude to three scholars—Grace Jantzen, Hannah Arendt and Judith Butler—who encouraged my feminist leanings. Jantzen’s reading of Arendt’s The Human Condition (1959) prompted her move from a literal to a figurative form of the term ‘natality’. Arendt’s emphasis on human suf...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Joy, Morny (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Equinox Publ. [2021]
Em: Journal for the academic study of religion
Ano: 2020, Volume: 33, Número: 3, Páginas: 221–243
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Jantzen, Grace 1948-2006 / Arendt, Hannah 1906-1975 / Diferenças sexuais / Violência / Teoria da ação / Butler, Judith 1956-
Classificações IxTheo:AB Filosofia da religião
AD Sociologia da religião
VA Filosofia
Outras palavras-chave:B Resistance
B ‘depathologize’
B bodily ontology
B vigilant
B Non-violence
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:This article is one of gratitude to three scholars—Grace Jantzen, Hannah Arendt and Judith Butler—who encouraged my feminist leanings. Jantzen’s reading of Arendt’s The Human Condition (1959) prompted her move from a literal to a figurative form of the term ‘natality’. Arendt’s emphasis on human suffering also attracted Jantzen. Instead of rejecting Arendt’s ‘natality’ as a literal mode of maternity, Jantzen affirmed Arendt’s position, where, together with constructive work, ‘natality’ can initiate dynamic change. Such a new beginning, inherent in birth, is recognized in the world only because newcomers possess a capacity of beginning, of something new, i.e., of action. ‘It initiates the dynamic element of action, and thus natality, which is inherent in all human activity’ (Arendt 1959: 10-11). Judith Butler’s publications have provided provocative challenges since Gender Trouble (1990). Recently, however, Butler has invoked ethical responsibility in an era of ‘senseless death’. She recommends a new bodily ontology which may initiate another dynamic change.
ISSN:2047-7058
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Journal for the academic study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/jasr.42948